2.2 – When Not to Proceed without Reviewing Safety Procedures

Sometimes laboratory workers should not proceed with what seems to be a familiar task. Hazards may exist that are not fully recognized. Certain indicators (procedural changes) should cause the employee to stop and review the safety aspects of their procedure. These indicators include:

  • A new procedure, process or test, even if it is very similar to older practices.
  • A change or substitution of any of the ingredient chemicals in a procedure.
  • A substantial change in the amount of chemicals used (scale up of experimental procedures); usually one should review safety practices if the volume of chemicals used increases by 200%.
  • A failure of any of the equipment used in the process, especially safeguards such as chemical fume hoods.
  • Unexpected experimental results (such as a pressure increase, increased reaction rates, unanticipated byproducts). When an experimental result is different from the predicted, a review of how the new result impacts safety practices should be made.
  • Chemical odors, illness in the laboratory staff that may be related to chemical exposure or other indicators of a failure in engineered safeguards.

The occurrence of any of these conditions should cause the laboratory employee to pause, evaluate the safety implications of these changes or results, make changes as necessary and proceed cautiously.